<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Women's Policy Consultation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrats Online Policy Consultation Group</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Consultation paper by Namioty</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Namioty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=18#comment-795</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Some Info...&lt;/strong&gt;

I think you spend numerous effort and time updating your blog. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some Info&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I think you spend numerous effort and time updating your blog. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome by Felicitas Cessna</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/2008/10/08/welcome/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicitas Cessna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?p=13#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Howdy. Actually needed to make a short note and ask where you bought your particular web layout I am starting off own internet page and really really like your specific model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy. Actually needed to make a short note and ask where you bought your particular web layout I am starting off own internet page and really really like your specific model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summary by Litery podświetlane</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/summary/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Litery podświetlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=20#comment-754</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Look at me...&lt;/strong&gt;

.I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and will come back in the foreseeable future. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Look at me&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>.I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and will come back in the foreseeable future. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome by Abamba</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/2008/10/08/welcome/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Abamba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?p=13#comment-479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I like the {valuable&#124;helpful} {information&#124;info} you provide in your articles. {I will&#124;I’ll} bookmark your {weblog&#124;blog} and check again here {frequently&#124;regularly}. {I am&#124;I'm} quite {certain&#124;sure} {I will&#124;I’ll} learn {lots of&#124;many&#124;a lot of&#124;plen...&lt;/strong&gt;

I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i'm glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I like the {valuable|helpful} {information|info} you provide in your articles. {I will|I’ll} bookmark your {weblog|blog} and check again here {frequently|regularly}. {I am|I&#8217;m} quite {certain|sure} {I will|I’ll} learn {lots of|many|a lot of|plen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i&#8217;m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Feeling Safe by Angie R</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/feeling-safe/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=53#comment-169</guid>
		<description>*blows off cobwebs*

I don't feel safe on the streets nowadays because I am living under a Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government.  Can the Government please deal with this menace.  Perhaps it could pass a law granting anonymity to rape suspects and impede evidence collection. No, wait. Not that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*blows off cobwebs*</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel safe on the streets nowadays because I am living under a Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government.  Can the Government please deal with this menace.  Perhaps it could pass a law granting anonymity to rape suspects and impede evidence collection. No, wait. Not that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sex by Elzbieta Vine</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/sex/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Elzbieta Vine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=42#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I like Jo's idea of taxis taking credit/debit cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Jo&#8217;s idea of taxis taking credit/debit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Money by Elzbieta Vine</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/money/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Elzbieta Vine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 20:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=33#comment-147</guid>
		<description>To tacle to pensions' gap, the time that women take off of work to bring up their families should be counted towards pension, that means National Contributions should be paid by the Governemnt on behalf of those women. 

Two mechanisms should be helpful in takcling the gender pay gap:
1. The salaries of all employees in the company should be openly published, and this must be required by law, and
2. there must be a mechanism that allows employess to aks their employer ( in writing) to explain a pay gap, if any exists.
Please leave your comments, if you have any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To tacle to pensions&#8217; gap, the time that women take off of work to bring up their families should be counted towards pension, that means National Contributions should be paid by the Governemnt on behalf of those women. </p>
<p>Two mechanisms should be helpful in takcling the gender pay gap:<br />
1. The salaries of all employees in the company should be openly published, and this must be required by law, and<br />
2. there must be a mechanism that allows employess to aks their employer ( in writing) to explain a pay gap, if any exists.<br />
Please leave your comments, if you have any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working group membership by Ettie Spencer</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/working-group-membership/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Ettie Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=8#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Hi
I am presenting the following to my branch (East Lothian) as a possible motion for the Spring Conference. The initial issue is an Educational one, but I also think this is a very important one for women - and addresses along the way, I believe, why there are not enough women active in politics at MP level...I would be interested to have your views on this as a possible motion regarding Women's issues... thanks Ettie Spencer....

Proposal for a Policy Motion for the Scottish Spring Conference 2010:                                      
EDUCATION  -  RE-THINKING THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF LIFE AND THE STATUS OF PARENTING.

Conference is concerned that:
1.	Too great an emphasis on providing more universal childcare may not be the best approach to supporting parents and young children in the early years.
2.	Recent research into brain development shows that the first three years of life are vital for any human being to reach full potential. Without the right mix of stimulation and secure attachment – usually from one or both parents – a child may be in line for attachment and behavioural difficulties – and in the long term mental health problems.
3.	Beginning nursery too early forces the child’s separation from its parents, which happens naturally, usually in the third year of life. This can threaten that continuity between parent and child, vital to healthy brain development. 
4.	Without such stimulation and attachment, it has been shown that the brain loses its capacity to make important internal connections and to take on information in a sponge-like way by the third year. In extreme cases of neglect, the brain is under-developed and stays that way.
5.	In our society, the role of parent has no parity of status with almost any job. The simple fact that we can suggest that “leave” from one’s main job should be given to support parenting, rather than the other way around – “leave” from one’s responsibilities as a parent to go to work – indicates how far we have fallen.
6.	Without good-enough parenting, there will be no workforce and no economy –and indeed in some sectors of society, caught in cycles of deprivation, neglect and abuse, there is only unemployment and a black market economy.
7.	It is currently estimated (report by New Philanthropy Capital, “Heads Up”, 2009) that a child excluded from school costs the state upwards of £20,000, and that in the school career of that child – with their accrued difficulties – this will rise to over £60,000. Such statistics, tied as they are to families where parenting skills are low, and neglect is rife, suggest that the earliest intervention is the most economic and has the best chance of success. 


This motion proposes therefore that:
1.	Parenting is accorded the status of a professional job, given its fundamental importance.
2.	Tied to that status is a requirement for adequate training in child-development and parenting. This should be first introduced into the core curriculum in High Schools, on a par with other core subjects such as maths, English etc. Such training – stepped up with the imminence of parenthood – should also be given recognition in the workplace. The transferable skills gained as a good-enough parent are arguably, both emotional and practical primers for some of the hardest management tasks.
3.	In recognition of its revised status, a way is found to re-direct resources – both statutory and corporate – to pay a meaningful wage (not a benefit) for the job, with provisos around parents accepting ongoing training and support.         
                                                                                                             E.S     1.1.10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I am presenting the following to my branch (East Lothian) as a possible motion for the Spring Conference. The initial issue is an Educational one, but I also think this is a very important one for women - and addresses along the way, I believe, why there are not enough women active in politics at MP level&#8230;I would be interested to have your views on this as a possible motion regarding Women&#8217;s issues&#8230; thanks Ettie Spencer&#8230;.</p>
<p>Proposal for a Policy Motion for the Scottish Spring Conference 2010:<br />
EDUCATION  -  RE-THINKING THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF LIFE AND THE STATUS OF PARENTING.</p>
<p>Conference is concerned that:<br />
1.	Too great an emphasis on providing more universal childcare may not be the best approach to supporting parents and young children in the early years.<br />
2.	Recent research into brain development shows that the first three years of life are vital for any human being to reach full potential. Without the right mix of stimulation and secure attachment – usually from one or both parents – a child may be in line for attachment and behavioural difficulties – and in the long term mental health problems.<br />
3.	Beginning nursery too early forces the child’s separation from its parents, which happens naturally, usually in the third year of life. This can threaten that continuity between parent and child, vital to healthy brain development.<br />
4.	Without such stimulation and attachment, it has been shown that the brain loses its capacity to make important internal connections and to take on information in a sponge-like way by the third year. In extreme cases of neglect, the brain is under-developed and stays that way.<br />
5.	In our society, the role of parent has no parity of status with almost any job. The simple fact that we can suggest that “leave” from one’s main job should be given to support parenting, rather than the other way around – “leave” from one’s responsibilities as a parent to go to work – indicates how far we have fallen.<br />
6.	Without good-enough parenting, there will be no workforce and no economy –and indeed in some sectors of society, caught in cycles of deprivation, neglect and abuse, there is only unemployment and a black market economy.<br />
7.	It is currently estimated (report by New Philanthropy Capital, “Heads Up”, 2009) that a child excluded from school costs the state upwards of £20,000, and that in the school career of that child – with their accrued difficulties – this will rise to over £60,000. Such statistics, tied as they are to families where parenting skills are low, and neglect is rife, suggest that the earliest intervention is the most economic and has the best chance of success. </p>
<p>This motion proposes therefore that:<br />
1.	Parenting is accorded the status of a professional job, given its fundamental importance.<br />
2.	Tied to that status is a requirement for adequate training in child-development and parenting. This should be first introduced into the core curriculum in High Schools, on a par with other core subjects such as maths, English etc. Such training – stepped up with the imminence of parenthood – should also be given recognition in the workplace. The transferable skills gained as a good-enough parent are arguably, both emotional and practical primers for some of the hardest management tasks.<br />
3.	In recognition of its revised status, a way is found to re-direct resources – both statutory and corporate – to pay a meaningful wage (not a benefit) for the job, with provisos around parents accepting ongoing training and support.<br />
                                                                                                             E.S     1.1.10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sex by Amy</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/sex/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=42#comment-76</guid>
		<description>The burden should not be on the victim to prevent crime but on the state to enforce the law, and encouraging women to get into taxis or to avoid walking the streets at night might be practical in the short term but fails to address the real problems underlying the sorry state of rape laws and their enforcement in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The burden should not be on the victim to prevent crime but on the state to enforce the law, and encouraging women to get into taxis or to avoid walking the streets at night might be practical in the short term but fails to address the real problems underlying the sorry state of rape laws and their enforcement in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on "I can have it all" by Rachel Aston</title>
		<link>http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/consultation-paper/i-can-have-it-all/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Aston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consult.libdems.org.uk/new/women/?page_id=25#comment-43</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most frustrating sentiments in the gender equality debate - can/should women "have it all". From the outset, it suggests that women should only have certain rights/roles/tasks - when is there ever any mention of men "having it all?" Some may argue that men lose out on home and family life in the area of work/life balance, but are generally seen as heroic when they step up to their home responsiblities - they are not then acused of neglecting their work life in the pursuit of "having it all"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most frustrating sentiments in the gender equality debate - can/should women &#8220;have it all&#8221;. From the outset, it suggests that women should only have certain rights/roles/tasks - when is there ever any mention of men &#8220;having it all?&#8221; Some may argue that men lose out on home and family life in the area of work/life balance, but are generally seen as heroic when they step up to their home responsiblities - they are not then acused of neglecting their work life in the pursuit of &#8220;having it all&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

